‹ BackNewsMarket Making

Market Making

Long.xyz rolls out community treasury LP upgrade for stock-token market making
South Korea
2026-09-28 22:16:05

South Korea Weighs Legalizing Crypto Market Making as FSC Eyes Stronger Oversight of Exchanges

South Korea’s Financial Services Commission is reviewing whether to permit crypto market making, while also considering a broader shift in how digital asset exchanges are supervised. Yoo Young-joon, director general for digital finance policy at the FSC, said the regulator will examine whether market making and similar mechanisms are needed to improve efficiency and stability in digital asset markets. Under the current Virtual Asset User Protection Act, there is no exemption for market making, meaning the practice can fall under the law’s ban on unfair trading, including price manipulation. Yoo also outlined items under review for the proposed Digital Asset Basic Act, which would form the second phase of South Korea’s crypto legislation. He said core exchange functions such as order matching, token listings, and surveillance for abnormal trades may need to move from self-regulation to public oversight. As an example, he pointed to criticism surrounding the recent listing of yen stablecoin JPYC on Upbit. The token briefly surged to 37.60 won after trading opened on Sept. 17, far above the roughly 8.85 won value of one Japanese yen at the time, before falling back after additional deposit routes were opened. Data released by lawmaker Park Min-gyu showed that 21,219 investors bought JPYC at prices at least 10% above the won-yen rate between Sept. 17 and Sept. 21, spending about 259.9 billion won.

200
South Korea Weighs Legalizing Crypto Market Making as FSC Eyes Stronger Oversight of Exchanges
South Korea
2026-09-28 02:57:51

South Korea’s FSC studies market-making framework for digital assets

South Korea’s Financial Services Commission is studying whether to introduce a formal market-making regime for virtual assets, according to a report by Digital Asset cited by BlockBeats on Sept. 28. The discussion matters because the country’s current Virtual Asset User Protection Act does not provide an exception for market-making, leaving such activity at risk of being treated as unfair trading or even market manipulation under existing rules. Ryu Young-jun, a digital finance policy official at the FSC, said the regulator will examine systems including market making in an effort to improve the efficiency and stability of the digital asset market. His comments were interpreted as a sign that South Korea could consider allowing market making in the second phase of its digital asset legislation. Ryu also said a future Digital Asset Basic Act may tighten oversight of trading platforms, fair trading, corporate governance and conflicts of interest. The broader policy direction under review also covers expanding custody, trading, brokerage, asset management and investment advisory businesses, setting up issuance and disclosure rules for digital assets, advancing a won-denominated stablecoin, strengthening user protection, and potentially shifting key exchange functions such as trade matching, listing and abnormal transaction monitoring from self-regulation toward a public regulatory framework.

190
South Korea’s FSC studies market-making framework for digital assets
On Robinhood Chain, tokenized stock LP profits depend heavily on pair selection and timing
Kalshi’s crypto volume faces wash trading questions as executive defends market structure
Lido DAO reviews proposal to set aside 7.5 million LDO for emergency market making
Fables nears end of points campaign as Robinhood Chain market-maker faces token and timing questions
Binance
2026-08-29 10:19:27

WuBlockchain repost says Binance may chase after-hours stock pricing power with Perps, while bStocks serve as inventory and correction rails

A reposted WuBlockchain article argues that Binance’s stock-product strategy is not about building a better Nasdaq. The thesis is narrower and more structural: if the exchange wants influence over post-close stock pricing, the front line is perpetual futures, not tokenized spot stocks. In this framework, Perps absorb directional views, leverage and rapid trading during market closures, while bStocks act as the inventory layer that can be held, transferred, converted, posted as collateral and used for hedging. The article compares weekend and reopening data for NVDA, TSLA, SNDK, SPCX and SKHY-related contracts, and repeatedly returns to one point: heavy trading alone does not prove price discovery. In a 25-sample set covering U.S. market close-to-reopen windows, Sunday direction matched the next cash open only 13 times, or 52%. SNDK and SPCX posted large weekend turnover and high fill rates, yet those figures, the author says, likely reflect market making, arbitrage and systematic flow as much as independent investor conviction. The piece also argues that bStocks should not be judged mainly by ticker count, AUM or headline volume. Their strategic role lies in inventory, borrowing, conversion and balance-sheet mobility. Perps can produce a candidate price, but bStocks are meant to turn that price into an asset that can be financed, transported, hedged and, if wrong, arbitraged back into line.

1050
WuBlockchain repost says Binance may chase after-hours stock pricing power with Perps, while bStocks serve as inventory and correction rails